HKSAR v. He Lihua
Read the full judgment text of HCMA 251/2005 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 28 April 2005.
1. This Appellant appeals a total sentence of 15 months’ imprisonment following her use of a forged identity card, in a situation where she was found to be working, and breach of a condition of stay. She received sentences of 15 months and 2 months to run concurrently.
|
HCMA251/2005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. HCMA 251 OF 2005 (ON APPEAL FROM ESCC 672 OF 2005) ____________________ BETWEEN
____________________ Before: Deputy High Court Judge Line in Court Date of Hearing: 28 April 2005 Date of Judgment: 28 April 2005 ____________________ J U D G M E N T ____________________ 1.This Appellant appeals a total sentence of 15 months’ imprisonment following her use of a forged identity card, in a situation where she was found to be working, and breach of a condition of stay. She received sentences of 15 months and 2 months to run concurrently. 2.The recent decision of the Court of Appeal in the case of HKSAR v Lee Chang Lee [2004] HCMA935 has made it absolutely clear that a sentence of 15 months in these circumstances will be imposed in the absence of exceptional humanitarian grounds. The Appellant cannot demonstrate any such exceptional grounds, though she does tell a moving story of hardship and pressure. 3.In those circumstances, the appeals against sentence must be dismissed. 4.These are the formal reasons I now announce. I have already explained in simple language in terms I hope that the Appellant understood the history of the sentencing leading up to the case of Lee Chang Lee, and why she was so still able to meet people in prison who had been sentenced to less than her.
Representations: Appellant, He Lihua, in person Ms Lily Ho May-Yu, Senior Government Counsel, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent |