Read the full judgment text of HCSD 000006/2005 on BabelCite. This HCSD judgment was delivered on 3 June 2005.
1. This judgment deals with an argument on costs. The application for setting aside the Statutory Demand has been concluded at the last hearing when the respondent did not raise any objection to it. Despite the setting aside of the Statutory Demand, the respondent still asks for costs of the application. The respondent’s argument is that the applicant has behaved unreasonably and escalated costs unnecessarily. The Applicant on the other hand asks for costs to follow the event.
Cited by 1 case