Read the full judgment text of HCMA 000240/2005 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment.
1. The Appellant was convicted on his own plea of one charge of “Using a forged travel document”, contrary to section 42(2)(b) of the of the Immigration Ordinance, Cap. 115 (“1 st charge”); and one charge of “Making a false representation to an Immigration Assistant”, contrary to section 42(1)(a) of the said Immigration Ordinance (“2 nd charge”).