Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 002373/2002 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
1. In this claim the Plaintiffs claim against the 1 st 2 nd and 3 rd Defendants respectively for damages arising from the sale by the 1 st Defendant to the 1 st Plaintiff of ink cartridges which had the trade mark “Epson” which trade mark was found to have been forged. The 2 nd and 3 rd Defendants were at the material times the Directors of the 1 st Defendant. On the 17 July 2001, the Customs & Excise Depart of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region charged the 2 nd Plaintiff with the off