Read the full judgment text of CACV 000113/2005 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 20 July 2005.
1. By a petition presented on 25 July 2003 (as amended), the Petitioner seeks various orders, some in the alternative, under sections 168A and 177(1)(f) of the of the Companies Ordinance, Cap.32 (“the Ordinance”). This is HCCW 804/2003. The subject company is the 3rd Respondent. The Petitioner, 1st Respondent and 2nd Respondent are all shareholders of the company. It is pleaded in the petition that although the 1st Respondent is the majority shareholder of the 3rd Respondent, the effective s
Cites 2 cases