Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 003338/2004 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 10 August 2005.
1. This is an action commenced by the Plaintiffs in June 2004. After issuance of the writ with a simple endorsement, the Plaintiffs did not serve the writ on the Defendants; in fact they never served the writ. According to the Defendants, the Plaintiffs circulated the writ to the customers of the Defendants. The Plaintiffs admits that they had circulated the writ to the Plaintiffs’ customers, but deny sending the writ to the Defendants’ customers. I do not speculate the motive of the Plainti
Cited by 1 case