Read the full judgment text of FAMV 000021/2005 on BabelCite. This FAMV judgment was delivered on 2 September 2005 before Chief Justice Li, Bokhary PJ, Chan PJ.
1. This is litigation between participants in an elaborately structured land development joint venture which fell through. Relief was granted to the applicant by Stone J but taken away by the Court of Appeal (Rogers VP and Le Pichon and Cheung JJA). The applicant now seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal. First, it contends that it is entitled to such leave as of right under s.22(1)(a) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap. 484. Let us examine that. One begins b
Legal issues: Right to appeal as of right under s.22(1)(a) Cap 484
Outcome: Leave to appeal granted as a matter of discretion under s.22(1)(b).
Cited by 2 cases