Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 005539/2003 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
1. The Plaintiff (“P”) claims damages from the 1st Defendant’s (“D1”) for breach of a tenancy agreement, and from D2 for the value on its dishonoured cheque issued on behalf of D1. On 22nd July 2003, as a result of D1’s interest, P offered to lease office premises, stating terms in a letter: see Bundle C page 10 (“C10”). On Saturday the 26th July shortly after midday, by D1’s “counteroffer” marked “Please refer to tenant’s clarification” on and using P’s original letter, D1 wanted to vary Item