Read the full judgment text of CACC 000283/2003 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 22 September 2005.
1. On 11 June 2003, the applicant was convicted by Judge Line in the District Court, following a trial lasting only 3½ days, on 4 charges (9, 10, 12 and 13) of procuring the making of an entry in a record of a bank by deception, contrary to section 18D of the Theft Ordinance, Cap. 210. He now seeks leave to appeal against each of these convictions which were effectively letter of credit (L/C) frauds. The judge acquitted the applicant of complicity in the offences reflected in 9 other charges o
Cites 1 case