Read the full judgment text of CACV 37/2004 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 16 September 2005.
1. The claimant, a Mainlander, who was in Hong Kong under a work visa, was employed under a continuous contract of employment by the defendant. The contract of employment contained a term whereby the defendant was entitled to transfer the claimant back to the Mainland for employment with an associated company.
Cited by 3 cases