Read the full judgment text of HCA 5474/2001 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 24 October 2005.
1. I will allow the insertion of the proposed undertaking for the following reasons: It is in similar terms of the undertaking given by the 1st defendant in dealing with similar expenses in the order of Mr Recorder Wong dated 17 May 2004. These expenses are allowed for a specific purpose: for travelling to and for living expenses in Hong Kong and, more importantly, for retaining mainland lawyers. As a matter of principle, it is in the same vein as the order of Mr Recorder Wong. That the amou