Read the full judgment text of FACV 000009/2005 on BabelCite. This FACV judgment was delivered on 22 November 2005.
1. The appellant Wonderyouth Industries Ltd (“Wonderyouth”) was indebted to the respondent China Great Wall Finance Co. (“Great Wall”). When sued by Great Wall for repayment, Wonderyouth referred to various payments which it had made to other companies. Wonderyouth said - and therefore bore the burden of proving - that those payments were made in reduction of its indebtedness to Great Wall. The trial judge refused to find that proved. And the Court of Appeal supported his refusal. It is tru
Cited by 1 case