Read the full judgment text of CACC 000484/1983 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. This is an appeal against conviction. The Counsel for the appellant quite properly submits that the only ground upon which challenged the magistrate's finding, which was essentially a finding of fact was on the basis that a Mr. Mok Yet Tim who was arrested the same time as the appellant was not called to give evidence because the appellant's legal adviser at that stage did not realize that he could give relevant evidence.