Lau Hay Wah v. The Queen

Read the full judgment text of CACC 485/1972 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.

1. This is an appeal against sentence. The appellant was guilty of the offence of robbery. This offence was committed in the afternoon of the 12th of April 1972. The robbery was committed in the company of others but no weapons were used. A young couple were approached by the appellant and the other two persons and they were robbed of cash and a wrist watch. The incident occurred in a quiet suburb of Kowloon, at Kadoorie Avenue near Braga Circuit. It is quite clear that the appellant and his fri

Case No.CACC 485/1972
Court
Court of Appeal
Date
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC000485/1972

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 485 OF 1972

-----------------

BETWEEN    
  LAU HAY WAH Appellant
  and  
  THE QUEEN Respondent

-----------------

Coram: Leonard, J.

Date of Judgment:

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

1. This is an appeal against sentence. The appellant was guilty of the offence of robbery. This offence was committed in the afternoon of the 12th of April 1972. The robbery was committed in the company of others but no weapons were used. A young couple were approached by the appellant and the other two persons and they were robbed of cash and a wrist watch. The incident occurred in a quiet suburb of Kowloon, at Kadoorie Avenue near Braga Circuit. It is quite clear that the appellant and his friends must have gone there in order to commit the offence. He has suggested to me that he passed through there naturally on his way to the cinema. Knowing the locality I regard this as a deliberate lie. On the other hand, I have had the advantage of seeing the parents of the appellant. They are obviously decent people who are appalled at his behaviour. There is no shadow of doubt that he deserves to go to the training centre where the learned magistrate decided that he should be sent.

2. On the other hand, this is his first offence. The probation officer has given a very favourable report. Having considered the matter most carefully, and having had the advantage, that the learned magistrate has not had, of seeing and hearing the parents of the appellant I consider there is room for lenience.

3. In all the circumstances of the case, I am prepared to allow this appeal. The appellant will be placed on probation for a period of two years. During the period of that probation he shall reside with his parents. For the first six months of the probation he shall be indoors every evening not later that 9.30 p.m. It shall be a further condition of probation that the probationer shall attend such educational courses as the probation officer may from time to time suggest.

  (P.F.X. Leonard)

Representation: