Read the full judgment text of CACC 000501/1976 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The appellant in this case is an Australian business man who was upon a visit to Hong Kong. The agreed facts were that he arrived on the 10th of February 1975 and upon being asked the intended period of his stay he said he would be staying for four days. The immigration officer imposed a limit of stay of three months under the visitor conditions indicated by an immigration stamp placed upon the passport. On that same day the name of the defendant was given to the Companies Registrar by a repr