HKSAR v. Chan Sau Cheung
Read the full judgment text of HCMA 836/2005 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 21 October 2005.
1. This Appellant seeks to appeal against a conviction even though he had pleaded guilty and was legally represented at the time of such plea.
Cites 1 case
|
HCMA 836/2005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 836 OF 2005 (ON APPEAL FROM ESCC 1413 OF 2005) ____________ BETWEEN
____________ Before: The Honourable Mrs Justice V Bokhary in Court Date of Hearing: 21 October 2005 Date of Judgment: 21 October 2005 _______________ J U D G M E N T _______________ 1.This Appellant seeks to appeal against a conviction even though he had pleaded guilty and was legally represented at the time of such plea. 2.In his notice of appeal, he has written this:
3.I offered the Appellant an adjournment in order for him to seek legal advice and assistance, whether privately or through the Bar Free Legal Service Scheme. He declined an adjournment and proceeded with his appeal in person. 4.In his Statement of Findings, the Magistrate said this:
5.I have listened to the Appellant. I find no basis on which to accede to this appeal and the appeal is dismissed.
Appellant in Person Mr W T Chiu, GC of Department of Justice, for the Respondent |
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCMA 836/2005