Read the full judgment text of HCMA 300/2002 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 16 December 2005.
1. The applicant was represented before me on 14 May 2002 on his appeal against his conviction for an offence of making persistent telephone calls pursuant to section 20(c) of the Summary Offences Ordinance, Cap. 228. I allowed the appeal on the basis of a drafting error in the charge presented against him and I ordered a retrial. He was convicted again at that retrial, appealed again and that appeal was dismissed.