HKSAR v. China State Construction Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 672/2004 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 14 March 2005.

1.  In line P of paragraph 13 on page 5, the first word – “Constructor” should be replaced by the word – “Contractor”.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMA 672/2004
Court
High Court CFI
Date14 Mar 2005
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA 672/2004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 672 OF 2004

(ON APPEAL FROM TWS 19557/2003)

____________

BETWEEN

  HKSAR (香港特別行政區政府) Respondent
  and  
  CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (HONG KONG) LIMITED Appellant
  (中國建築工程(香港)有限公司)  

____________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge E Toh in Court

Date of Hearing: 10 and 12 November 2004

Date of Judgment: 14 March 2005

CORRIGENDA

Kindly note the following correction in the Judgment of the above mentioned case delivered by Deputy High Court Judge E Toh on 14 March 2005 ;

1.  In line P of paragraph 13 on page 5, the first word – “Constructor” should be replaced by the word – “Contractor”.

2.  In the first line of paragraph 14 on page 6, “…the Appellant was complying” should be replaced by “…the Appellant though complying”.

3.  In the second line of paragraph 20 on page 7, “…Appellant company had not showed…” should be replaced by “…Appellant company had not shown…”.

Dated the 16th March, 2005

  E Lau (Miss)
Clerk to DHCJ E Toh

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCMA 672/2004