Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 003482/2005 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
1. The Defendant was employed by the 1 st or 2 nd Plaintiff as an estate agent. The employment contract contained a clause of restraint of trade, prohibiting the Defendant from engaging in the real estate agency business in Tai Po area for 3 months after leaving the 1 st or 2 nd Plaintiff’s employment.