Read the full judgment text of CACV 000071/2005 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 13 January 2006.
1. The plaintiffs’ claim against the defendants is for damages for libel and slander, interference with economic relations and malicious falsehood as well as an injunction to prevent further libel and interference with the plaintiffs’ contractual relations. The plaintiffs’ claim was “permanently” stayed on the basis of forum non conveniens by Deputy Judge Carlson. The plaintiffs appealed that order.
Cited by 2 cases