Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 005605/2004 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
1. The Plaintiff’s claim is for the value of items lost due to the removal of various items of his articles by the Defendant when he was still a tenant of the Premises known as 2 nd floor, 11 St. Stephen’s Lane, Hong Kong. The defence is that the tenancy was terminated on 19.6.2003 by mutual agreement, and as from that day, the Premises were let to a Mr. Robert Novoa (“Robert Novoa”), at a monthly rent of $12,000. On or about 4.8.2003, Robert Novoa returned possession of the Premises to the De