Read the full judgment text of FAMV 000038/2005 on BabelCite. This FAMV judgment was delivered on 13 March 2006.
1. The central question at the trial was whether the parties had reached a concluded contract for the letting of space in a shopping mall. The defendant (the present applicant for leave to appeal) owns the property and the plaintiffs (the respondents) – differences between them not being material for present purposes – were the intending tenants.
Cites 3 cases