Read the full judgment text of CACV 000329/2005 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 22 March 2006.
1. This is an appeal by the plaintiffs against the judgment of Yam J given on 20 September 2005, whereby both the plaintiffs’ applications for summary judgment under Order 14 of the RHC and for issues to be determined by the court under Order 14A were refused. The judge granted the defendants unconditional leave to defend. He ordered that the costs of the applications be costs in the cause save that the costs of the plaintiffs’ summons dated 28 June 2005 and of the hearing on 5 July 2005 be to
Cites 1 case