Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 17 March 2006.
1. I have had the advantage of reading the judgments of both Mrs Justice Le Pichon JA and Madam Justice Yuen JA. At the hearing of this appeal I agreed that this appeal should be dismissed. I did so for the simple reason that the master had held the plaintiff’s solicitors had sent the letter of 30 October 1997 to the defendant and that that constituted an election for the remedy of damages and an abandonment of the claim for specific performance. I saw no ground for disturbing that finding.