Read the full judgment text of HCA 9932/1999 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 7 April 2006.
1. By summons issued on 30 March 2005, the defendant applied for inspection by him and his authorized representative of “the originals of telephone records as well as tapes as disclosed by the plaintiff per item 16 of the Plaintiff’s List of Documents and item 1 of the Plaintiff’s Supplementary List of Documents”. At the hearing on 11 April 2005, the defendant was absent. The Master therefore adjourned the summons sine dine with liberty to restore.
Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case