Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 6435/2004 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
1. By this application, the 1 st Defendant seeks to vary the costs order nisi made by this court on 30.12.2005, on the ground that since the substantive claim of the Plaintiffs is in respect of breach of confidentiality and that the interlocutory injunction was dismissed, costs should follow the event. Hence the 1 st Defendant should be entitled to the costs in relation to that dismissed interlocutory application as well as costs occasioned by the Plaintiffs’ claims for permanent injunction. H
Cites 1 case