Read the full judgment text of HCCT 45/2006 on BabelCite. This 高等法院原訟法庭 judgment was delivered on 26 May 2006 before Hon Chung J.
Mareva injunction — ex parte application — urgency — plaintiff applied ex parte Mareva injunction for alleged non-delivery of goods occurring about one month prior — defendant engaged Hong Kong solicitors and paying bank indicated imminent payment — court found no sufficient urgency for ex parte relief — plaintiff should have applied earlier inter partes or ex parte on notice — application refused — further application for interim relief between now and inter partes application also refused as inappropriate.
Legal issues: Whether urgency justified ex parte Mareva injunction · Appropriateness of interim injunction pending inter partes application
Outcome: Ex parte application for Mareva injunction refused; interim order also refused
Cites 1 case