Thai Long Investments Ltd v. The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd
Read the full judgment text of HCCL 4/2006 on BabelCite. This HCCL judgment was delivered on 26 May 2006.
1. This is the plaintiff’s ex parte application for an injunction order to be re-granted (the original order having been discharged earlier today).
Cited by 2 cases
|
HCCL 4/2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE COMMERCIAL ACTION NO. 4 OF 2006 ____________ BETWEEN
______________ Before: Hon Chung J in Chambers Date of Hearing: 26 May 2006 Date of Decision: 26 May 2006 _______________ D E C I S I O N _______________ 1.This is the plaintiff’s ex parte application for an injunction order to be re-granted (the original order having been discharged earlier today). 2.Mr Chan has, in his usual eloquence, advanced the plaintiff’s case in the best possible light. 3.However, I consider that there is no sufficient change of circumstances from the state of affairs standing as at the time of the hearing earlier today. 4.For this reason, I do not consider it appropriate to re-grant the injunction order sought by the plaintiff in this ex parte application.
Mr Anthony Chan, SC Leading Mr H Y Wong, instructed by Messrs Cheung Chan & Chung, for the Plaintiff |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCCL 4/2006