Read the full judgment text of HCMA 000903/2005 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 2 June 2006.
1. The appellant was convicted after trial of nine charges of “procuring the making of an entry in the record of a bank by deception” [Charges 1 to 9] contrary to section 18D(1) of the Theft Ordinance (Cap. 210) and six charges of “theft” [Charges 10 to 15] contrary to section 9 of the same. The appellant was sentenced to 150 hours of community service. He now appeals against the convictions.