Read the full judgment text of FAMV 24/2006 on BabelCite. This FAMV judgment was delivered on 21 June 2006 before Rogers VP, Le Pichon JA, Chung J.
Civil procedure – leave to appeal to Court of Final Appeal – non-party costs – funding litigation – Dymock's Franchise Systems principles – Companies Ordinance s.265(5B) – whether questions of great general or public importance arise – application dismissed as academic – costs order against interveners – subsequent leave granted by Court of Final Appeal
Legal issues: Whether questions of law arise for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal dismissed with costs.