HKSAR v. Ng Pui-ling, Akina

Read the full judgment text of CACC 519/2005 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 14 July 2006.

1. The applicant was convicted by Judge M Yuen on seven charges of obtaining property by deception and one charge of possessing an identity card relating to another person (charge 12) following a trial in the District Court.  A sentence totalling 4 years and 9 months’ imprisonment was imposed.

Cites 2 cases

Case No.CACC 519/2005
Court
Court of Appeal
Date14 Jul 2006
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC 519/2005

 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

criminal APPEAL NO. 519 OF 2005

(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC NO. 429 of 2005)

____________________

BETWEEN

  HKSAR Respondent
  and   
  NG PUI-LING, AKINA (吳珮玲) (D1) Applicant

____________________

Before:   Hon Stuart-Moore VP

Date of Hearing: 14 July 2006

Date of Judgment: 14 July 2006

______________________

J U D G M E N T

______________________

1.The applicant was convicted by Judge M Yuen on seven charges of obtaining property by deception and one charge of possessing an identity card relating to another person (charge 12) following a trial in the District Court.  A sentence totalling 4 years and 9 months’ imprisonment was imposed.

2.Mr Eddie Sean responsibly and rightly accepted on behalf of the respondent that the 3-year starting point adopted by the judge on the 12th charge was manifestly excessive.  This was apparently imposed without reference to authority.  In any event, therefore, leave must be given.  Whether a successful appeal against sentence on this charge will be of any value to the applicant will depend on the view taken by the full court when the matter is heard.  I say this because only 3 months of the sentence on the 12th charge was ordered to run consecutively to the 4½ years imposed by the judge on the remaining charges all of which related to the fraudulent use of counterfeit credit cards.

3.The full court may also wish to consider the totality of sentence in the light of various recent decisions in this court since the formulation of the sentencing guidelines in R v Chan Sui-to and Anor [1996] 2 HKCLR 128.

4.Leave to appeal against sentence is granted.

  (M. Stuart-Moore)
Vice-President

Mr Eddie Sean, SGC, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent.

The Applicant (D1), in person.