Strong Offer Investment Ltd (in Liquidation) v. Nyeu Ting Chuang
Read the full judgment text of CACV 384/2004 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 19 July 2006.
1. Since our judgment is a final judgment involving a liquidated sum of over $1 million, the intended appeal by the defendant to the Court of Final Appeal is as of right, under section 22 of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap 484.
Cited by 3 cases
|
CACV 384/2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 384 OF 2004 (ON APPEAL FROM HCa NO. 10541 OF 2000) ____________________________ BETWEEN
____________________________ Before : Hon Woo VP, Yeung JA and Yuen JA in Court Date of Hearing : 19 July 2006 Date of Decision : 19 July 2006 ----------------------- D E C I S I O N ----------------------- Hon Woo VP (giving the decision of the Court): 1.Since our judgment is a final judgment involving a liquidated sum of over $1 million, the intended appeal by the defendant to the Court of Final Appeal is as of right, under section 22 of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap 484. 2.Pursuant to sections 23 and 25 of the Ordinance, leave is granted conditional upon the defendant within 28 days paying a sum of $400,000 into court as security for the due prosecution of the intended appeal and for the plaintiff’s costs of the intended appeal. 3.Costs be in the cause of the intended appeal.
Ms Jane Curzon Lo instructed by Messrs J Chan & Lai, for the Plaintiff (Respondent) Mr R A Coleman SC instructed by Messrs Charles Chu & Kenneth Sit, for the Defendant (Appellant) |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 384/2004