Cheung Wai Leung and Another v. Kung Ngai Cheung

Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 1083/2006 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.

1. This is a claim for damages for breach of contract in an aborted sale of a property.

Case No.DCCJ 1083/2006
Court
District Court
Date
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

DCCJ 1083/2006

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1083 OF 2006

BETWEEN

  CHEUNG WAI LEUNG (張偉良) &
TSUI LAI HUNG (徐麗紅)
Plaintiffs
  and  
  KUNG NGAI CHEUNG (龔藝祥) Defendant

Coram: Deputy District Judge Anthony Chow in Chambers (open to public)

Date of Hearing:  20th July 2006

Date of Handing Down Judgment: 24th July 2006

---------------------------------------

ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES

---------------------------------------

1.This is a claim for damages for breach of contract in an aborted sale of a property.

2.The plaintiffs were at all material times the registered owners of Flat D, 40/F, Tower 8 Albany Cove, No. 1 Kin Tung Road, Caribbean Coast, Tung Chung, Lantau Island, New Territories, Hong Kong (the “Property”).

3.On or about 15/8/2005, the defendant and the plaintiffs entered into a provisional agreement of purchase and sale of the Property at the price of HK$2,838,000.00. Upon signing of the provisional agreement, the defendant paid an initial deposit of HK$141,900.00. On or about 30/8/2005, the parties entered into a formal sale and purchase agreement (the “Agreement”).

4.Completion was scheduled for 27/1/2006, however, the defendant failed to complete as scheduled. Pursuant to clause 12 of the Agreement, the deposit was forfeited.

5.To mitigate their damages, the plaintiffs immediately re-listed the Property with an estate agent for re-sale on the open market. On or about 4/2/2006, the Property was resold for $2,200,000.00. The resale transaction was completed on 8/4/2006.

6.The Plaintiffs claimed HK$532,772.00 as damages from the defendant.

7.On or about 21/3/2006, the Plaintiffs applied for summary judgment against the Defendants.

8.On or about 10/4/2006, Master Chan entered judgment against the defendant on liability and assessment of damages was adjourned to a date to be fixed.

9.On or about 25/4/2006, the plaintiffs hired Messrs. Ian Cullen & Associates, Chartered Surveyors – Valuers, to complete a valuation report of the Property. Although by comparison the property was valued at HK$2,290,000.00, because the difference was only 4%, Mr. Ian Cullen accepted HK$2,200,000.00 as the market value of the Property.

10.Prior to this hearing the plaintiffs amended their claim for damages to the following:

a. Damages representing the original sale price and the resale price, less deposit received from the defendant in the sum of HK$496,100.00;

b. Unpaid rates and rents from 28/1/2006 to 12/4/2006 in the sum of HK$1,021.00; and

c. Unpaid management fees from 28/1/2006 to 12/4/2006 in the sum of HK$3,000.00.

11.Having heard the testimony of Mr. Ian Cullen, I accept his explanation that HK$2,200,000.00 was the market price of the Property at the time of the resale.

12.The defendant being absent and having reviewed all of the documentary evidence submitted by the plaintiffs, I assess the plaintiffs’ damages at HK$500,121.00.

Order:

13. (i) The defendant shall pay the plaintiffs the sum of HK$500,121.00 as damages.
  (ii)  Interest in accordance with section 50 of the District Court Ordinance.
  (iii) The defendant shall pay the plaintiffs costs of this action, together with costs of the Order 14 application and this assessment, with certificate for counsel, to be taxed if not agreed.

  (Anthony Chow)
Deputy District Judge

Miss Shannon Leung instructed by M/s Kong & Chang for the Plaintiffs.

The Defendant, unrepresented, absent.