Re Vitelic (Hong Kong) Ltd
Read the full judgment text of HCCW 130/2006 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 24 July 2006.
1. This is a petition presented against Vitelic (Hong Kong) Limited (“the Company”) by Advanced EPI Technology Corporation. The petitioning debt is in the sum of US$266,000, being the price of goods sold or provided during July 2005 to October 2005. A demand for this debt was served on the Company on 29 December 2005.
Cites 1 case
|
HCCW 130/2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 130 OF 2006 ____________
_______________ Before: Hon. Kwan J in Court Date of Hearing: 24 July 2006 Date of Judgment: 24 July 2006 _______________ J U D G M E N T _______________ 1.This is a petition presented against Vitelic (Hong Kong) Limited (“the Company”) by Advanced EPI Technology Corporation. The petitioning debt is in the sum of US$266,000, being the price of goods sold or provided during July 2005 to October 2005. A demand for this debt was served on the Company on 29 December 2005. 2.This petition was adjourned from May 2006 to accommodate the Company to complete a proposed assignment of an agreement for a lease, being a property occupied by the Company in the Science Park in Tai Po. 3.A validation order for the proposed transaction was made on 12 May 2006. For the Company to complete this transaction, it is necessary to obtain the consent of the Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation. 4.I understand from counsel for the petitioner that the Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation has refused consent and that the proposed transaction to be entered into by the Company has fallen through. 5.The Company has not appeared today and it has not filed any evidence to dispute the petitioning debt. That being the situation, I make a winding-up order against the Company. The petitioner’s costs are to be paid out of the Company’s assets.
Mr Kenneth Chik, instructed by Messrs Liao, Ho & Chan, for the Petitioner The Company, represented by Messrs Cordells, absent Miss Vivian Yeung, for the Official Receiver |
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCCW 130/2006