Csav Group (Hong Kong) Ltd and Another v. Jamshed Safdar
Read the full judgment text of CACV 133/2006 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 11 August 2006.
1. Following the delivery of judgment in this matter on 28 April 2006, the defendant raised the matter of two costs orders made in the court below on 29 March 2006. The plaintiffs subsequently indicated that they would be prepared to accept that those orders should be varied to defendant’s costs in the cause. Subsequently, at the invitation of the court, both parties indicated in writing that they agreed that that matter of costs should be dealt with by written submissions.
Cited by 2 cases
|
CACV133/2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 133 OF 2006 (ON APPEAL FROM DCCJ NO. 586 OF 2006) ------------------------ BETWEEN
------------------------ Before : Hon Rogers VP and Le Pichon JA Date of Handing Down Ruling : 11 August 2006 ----------------------------------------- RULING ON COSTS ----------------------------------------- 1.Following the delivery of judgment in this matter on 28 April 2006, the defendant raised the matter of two costs orders made in the court below on 29 March 2006. The plaintiffs subsequently indicated that they would be prepared to accept that those orders should be varied to defendant’s costs in the cause. Subsequently, at the invitation of the court, both parties indicated in writing that they agreed that that matter of costs should be dealt with by written submissions. 2.Having considered the written submissions, we are of the view that the correct order in respect of the two orders made on 29 March 2006 should be that they should be varied to defendant’s costs in the cause. In our view, the substance of the applications heard on 29 March 2006 was to give further directions in respect of the order dated 22 March 2006. Since that order has been varied to defendant’s costs in the cause it would appear appropriate to vary these costs orders likewise.
Written submissions on costs by Messrs Holman, Fenwick & Willan, for the Plaintiffs/Respondents Written submissions on costs by Messrs Clyde & Co., for the Defendant/Appellant |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 133/2006