Read the full judgment text of CACV 000371/2005 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 13 June 2006.
1. I agree with Yeung JA’s judgment and the orders he proposes. I wish only to give a brief summary of my own observations on the claim that World Tower has a proprietary or beneficial interest in the property, the subject matter of the redevelopment project (“the property”).
Cited by 8 cases