Read the full judgment text of DCPI 000611/2006 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 24 August 2006.
1. I have heard counsel for both plaintiff and the 1st and 2nd defendants. The plaintiff initially brought action against D1 and D2. In the defence filed, the 2nd defendant denied being the plaintiff’s employer and relied on particulars which they listed in paragraphs 2(a) to (d) of the defence. In their particulars, the names of parties were disclosed and the parties disclosed are now the intended D3 to D5 sought by the plaintiff to be added as defendants in this action. I also noted that t