Re Lai Sun Development Co Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 1850/2006 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 17 October 2006.

1. This petition was presented by Lai Sun Development Company Limited (“the Company”) for confirmation of a reduction of its share capital.

Case No.HCMP 1850/2006[2006] 4 HKLRD 573
Court
High Court CFI
Date17 Oct 2006
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 1850/2006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 1850 OF 2006

____________

  IN THE MATTER of Lai Sun Development Company Limited
  and
  IN THE MATTER of the Companies Ordinance (Chapter 32)

____________

Before: Hon Kwan J in Court

Date of Hearing:  17 October 2006

Date of Judgment: 17 October 2006

Date of Handing Down of Reasons for Judgment: 19 October 2006

_________________________________

REASONS  FOR  JUDGMENT

_________________________________

1.This petition was presented by Lai Sun Development Company Limited (“the Company”) for confirmation of a reduction of its share capital.

2.The Company was incorporated in Hong Kong on 29 June 1959 as a private company under its former name.  It became a public company in November 1972.  Its principal activities are property development, property investment and investment in hotels, telecommunications, media and the entertainment business.

3.The present authorised capital of the Company is HK$9,200,000,000.00 divided into 16,000,000,000 ordinary shares of HK$0.50 each and 1,200,000,000 10% non-voting cumulative participating redeemable preference shares of HK$1.00 each, of which 12,746,042.320 ordinary shares have been issued and are fully paid or credited as fully paid.  None of the preference shares are in issue.  The paid-up capital is HK$6,373,021,160.00.

4.There is provision in the articles of association for reduction of the share capital by special resolution in any manner authorised by and subject to any conditions prescribed by law.

5.By a special resolution of the Company passed in accordance with section 116 at an extraordinary general meeting on 24 July 2006, it was resolved that the paid-up capital of the Company be cancelled to the extent of HK$0.49 per ordinary share in issue on the date upon which the reduction of capital takes effect and that the nominal value of each ordinary share in the authorised share capital be reduced from HK$0.50 to HK$0.01.  As a consequence, the share capital will be reduced by HK$6,245,560.737.00.

6.The capital reduction has two purposes.  They were set out in a circular to all members of the Company dated 30 June 2006.

7.The first purpose is to reduce the nominal value of each ordinary share in the Company to an amount which is less than the price at which the Company’s shares have been trading on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited, thereby facilitating the ability to raise funds in future through allotment of the Company’s shares.

8.The second purpose is so that the Company may apply HK$5,619,000,000.00 of the credit arising from the capital reduction towards reducing in part the accumulated losses of the Company, which amounted to HK$11,067,292,000.00 as at 31 July 2005 and HK$10,966,746,399.00 as at 30 June 2006.  As a result, the Company’s paid-up capital will more closely reflect the available net assets of the Company.  The balance of the credit arising from the capital reduction that is not applied towards reducing the accumulated losses, being HK$626,560,736.80, will be credited to the Company’s share premium account and will continue to represent capital of the Company.

9.The proposed cancellation of issued and paid-up capital does not involve the diminution of any liability in respect of unpaid capital or the payment to any shareholder of any paid-up capital.

10.The accumulated loss position of the Company was set out in some detail in the supporting affirmation.  The amount of losses proposed to be written off reflects the Company’s losses in respect of two matters.

11.The first matter is its losses in respect of its interests in a wholly owned subsidiary called Smart Leader Limited (“Smart Leader”) and the former wholly owned subsidiary of Smart Leader, Furama Hotel Enterprises Limited (“FHEL”).  This has to do with the Company’s acquisition of the FHEL group of companies at the height of the property market in mid 1997, before the Asian financial crisis that year.  The companies in that group have never fully recovered and various companies and assets comprised within that group have been transferred or sold since 1997.  As a result, Smart Leader is now an inactive company with no assets and no prospects of returning any further sums to the Company.

12.As at 31 July 2005, the Company made a cumulative provision in respect of its investment in Smart Leader and FHEL of HK$5,245,000,000.00.  The Company’s auditors have confirmed that the above provision was agreed to the group’s books and records as at 31 July 2005 and it was a figure upon which the auditors based their audit of the annual financial statements for the year ended that date.  Since then, an additional and final provision of HK$2,000,000.00 was made by the Company in respect of this investment.  Thus, the total loss for this investment recorded by the Company was HK$5,247,000,000.00.

13.The second matter concerns the Company’s losses in respect of its interest in a wholly owned subsidiary called Peakflow Profits Limited (“Peakflow”), a company which, in turn, now holds a 10% interest in a company called Bayshore Development Group Limited (“Bayshore”), the owner of AIG Tower located at 1 Connaught Road, Central.  The Company had reduced and disposed of part of its indirect investment in Bayshore and losses were recorded on the disposal.

14.The Company had made a provision of HK$372,000,000.00 in its audited accounts as at 31 July 2005 being the net overall loss in respect of Peakflow.  The auditors had likewise confirmed that the provision was agreed to the group’s books and records and was a figure upon which they based their audit.

15.As the Company may yet derive further recovery in respect of certain underlying assets formerly held within the Smart Leader group to the extent that they continue to be held by other subsidiaries (the Company continues to own 50% of Fortune Sign Venture Inc. and therefore a half interest in the Majestic Hotel and Majestic Centre in Kowloon; 10% of Bayshore and therefore a 10% interest in AIG Tower; and 100% of FHEL and therefore the prospect of recovering the outstanding balance of the consideration due to FHEL in respect of the sale of the Furama Shenyang and to receive future amounts in respect of the few residual business interests of FHEL), the Company has proposed to credit any additional return from these remaining underlying assets to a special capital reserve for the protection of creditors and an appropriate undertaking is offered to give effect to this, the terms of which are set out in the schedule annexed to this judgment.

16.At the hearing of the summons for directions on 26 September 2006, I made an order to dispense with the settlement of a list of creditors.

17.The proposed reduction is for discernible purposes.  By the undertaking, I am satisfied that the interests of creditors would not be prejudiced.  I have therefore made an order in terms of the draft submitted.

  (S Kwan)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Mr Jonathan Harris, SC, instructed by Richards Butler, for the Petitioner

Schedule

The Company by its Leading Counsel undertaking that, forthwith upon the proposed reduction of capital taking effect,

(i) any receipts by the Company on or after 1 August 2005 in respect of the Company’s 50% investment in Fortune Sign Venture Inc. (the owner of the Majestic Hotel and Majestic Centre) up to an aggregate amount of HK$1,556,000,000.00;

(ii) any receipts by the Company on or after 1 August 2005 in respect of the Company’s 10% investment in Bayshore Development Group Limited (the owner of the AIG Tower) up to an aggregate amount of HK$2,923,000,000.00;

(iii) any receipts by the Company on or after 1 August 2005 in respect of the Company’s 100% investment in Furama Hotel Enterprises Limited up to an aggregate amount of HK$1,140,000,000.00.

will be credited to a special capital reserve (the “special capital reserve”) in the accounting records of the Company and that, for so long as there shall remain any debt of or claim against the Company outstanding as at the effective date of the reduction of capital (the “effective date”) which, if such date were the date of the commencement of the winding up of the Company, would be admissible in proof against the Company and the persons entitled to the benefit thereof shall not have agreed otherwise, such reserve

(i) shall not be treated as realised profits; and

(ii) shall be treated as an undistributable reserve of the Company for the purposes of Section 79C of the Companies Ordinance or any statutory re-enactment or modification thereof,

PROVIDED ALWAYS that:-

(1) the Company shall be at liberty to apply the special capital reserve for the same purposes as a share premium account may be applied;

(2) any amount standing to the credit of the special capital reserve (if any) may be reduced by the aggregate of any increase in the issued share capital or in the share premium account of the Company resulting from an issue of shares for cash or other new consideration or upon a capitalisation of distributable reserves after the effective date and the Company shall be at liberty to transfer the amount of any such reduction to the general reserves of the Company and the same shall become available for distribution;

(3) the aggregate limit in respect of the special capital reserve may be reduced after the disposal or other realisation of any of the assets the subject of the undertaking by the amount of the individual limit for the asset in question less such amount (if any) as is credited to the special capital reserve as a result of such disposal or realisation; and

(4) in the event that the amount standing to the credit of the special capital reserve exceeds the limit thereof, after any reduction of such limit pursuant to proviso (3) above, the Company shall be at liberty to transfer the amount of such excess to the general reserves of the Company and the same shall become available for distribution;

AND  the Company by its Leading Counsel further undertaking, for so long as the aforesaid undertaking shall remain effective:-

(a) to publish or cause to be published or procure its auditors to record by way of note or otherwise a summary of the aforesaid undertaking in its audited financial statements or in the accounts of the Company published in any other form; and

(b) to publish or cause to be published in any prospectus issued by or on behalf of the Company a summary of the aforesaid undertaking