Read the full judgment text of FAMV 000009/2006 on BabelCite. This FAMV judgment was delivered on 20 October 2006 before Chief Justice Li, Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ.
Civil procedure – appeal – leave to appeal – entitlement to appeal as of right – s.22(1)(a) Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance – question respecting property of value $1 million or more – appointment of managers of T'ong Tsing Wan Kun – judicial review of District Officer's decision – whether proposed appeal involves question respecting T'ong properties – no – distinction from Becker and Andrews – leave to appeal on grounds of great general and public importance – s.22(1)(b) – alleged misdirection by decision maker – exercise of power under s.15 New Territories Ordinance – factual finding of no misdirection – questions do not arise – application dismissed with costs
Legal issues: Entitlement to appeal as of right under s.22(1)(a) Cap. 484 · Leave to appeal on grounds of great general and public importance
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Cited by 3 cases