Jerry Chen v. Whirpool (Hong Kong) Ltd

Read the full judgment text of CACV 325/2005 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 24 October 2006.

1. We will refuse leave for the following reasons :

Cited by 2 cases

Case No.CACV 325/2005
Court
Court of Appeal
Date24 Oct 2006
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 325/2005

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 325 OF 2005

(ON APPEAL FROM HCPI NO. 787 OF 2001)

______________________

BETWEEN

  JERRY CHEN Plaintiff
  and  
   WHIRPOOL (HONG KONG) LIMITED Defendant

Before : Hon Cheung JA, Tang JA and Barma J in Court

Date of Hearing : 24 October 2006

Date of Decision : 24 October 2006

______________________

D E C I S I O N

______________________

Hon Cheung JA (giving decision of the court) :

1.We will refuse leave for the following reasons :

1) We are not satisfied that this case involves matters of great general or public importance.  First our decision is based on the unique facts of the case.  The relevant legal principles are well established.  Second while we accept many Hong Kong employers are asking their employees to work in the Mainland, we are not satisfied that the specific arrangement in this case is also a widespread practice which called for a determination by the Court of Final Appeal.

2) We are also not satisfied that this case comes within the ‘or otherwise limb’.  It has not been shown that the situation is exceptional.

(Peter Cheung)
Justice of Appeal
(Robert Tang)
Justice of Appeal
(Aarif Barma)
Judge of the Court of First Instance

Mr. K. M. Chong, instructed by Messrs Christine M. Koo & Ip, for the plaintiff

Mr. John Bleach, S.C., instructed by Messrs Clyde & Co., for the Defendant

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACV 325/2005