|
HCMP 1209/2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 1209 OF 2003
______________________
| |
IN THE MATTER of Hong Kong Uni-Honest Limited |
| |
and |
| |
IN THE MATTER of a Chinese Agreement dated 16 July 2002 made between the Plaintiffs and the 1st Defendants |
____________
BETWEEN
| |
WONG WAI KEUNG and YAU SUI CHING |
Plaintiffs |
| |
and |
|
| |
YING SHUDE and CHEN HAILIN |
1st Defendants |
| |
FUNG QINLI |
2nd Defendant |
| |
HONG KONG UNI-HONEST LIMITED |
3rd Defendant |
AND BETWEEN
| |
YING SHUDE |
Plaintiff |
| |
and |
|
| |
WONG WAI KEUNG and YAU SUI CHING |
1st Defendants |
| |
CHEN HAILIN |
2nd Defendant |
| |
(By 1st named 1st Defendant’s Counterclaim) |
|
____________
Before : Deputy High Court Judge L. Chan in Court
Dates of Hearing : 8, 11-14 July 2005
Dates of Closing Submission : 5 October and 23 December 2005
Date of Judgment : 31 July 2006
______________________
CORRIGENDUM
______________________
Page 18, Paragraph 40 Line C-D:
“Ying said that this draft dated 15 July 2002 was prepared by the” should be changed to “Ying said that this draft dated 15 July 2002 was prepared by the Plaintiffs.”
Page 19, Paragraph 45 Line M:
“it was treated as supplemental in nature pursuance to clause 6 of the 1st Agreement.” should be changed to “it was treated as supplemental in nature pursuant to clause 6 of the 1st Agreement.”
Page 21, Paragraph 49 Line I:
“the Plaintiffs’ solicitors accepted the 1st Defendants’ reputation of the 2nd Agreement for want of payment of the HK$10 million.” should be changed to “the Plaintiffs’ solicitors accepted the 1st Defendants’ repudiation of the 2nd Agreement for want of payment of the HK$10 million.”
Page 37, Paragraph 82 Line L:
“Ying did not explain Wong gave him the two undertakings.” should be changed to “Ying did not explain why Wong gave him the two undertakings.”
| |
(William K P Chong)
Clerk to DHCJ L. Chan |
Dated the 1st day of November 2006
|