Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 5125/2003 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment.
1. The Plaintiff applied for leave to appeal against my decision refusing them leave to re-amend their statement of Claim. My decision which was handed down on 28 th August 2006 was based mainly on the issue of relevance, as stated in Paragraph 8 therein, and also that the Plaintiff was “filibustering” when they were not proceeding and delaying with their claim against the Defendant, as stated in Paragraph 9 of my Decision. In other words, I took the view that the Plaintiff’s re-amendment was no
Cites 1 case