BabelCite

The Incorporated Owners of San Po Kong Mansion v. Island Management Services Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 1744/2004 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 31 October 2006.

1. Paragraph 16, Page 7: ‘Mr. Chong, counsel for the defendant, argues that in the first place,’ should be changed to ‘Mr. Lam , counsel for the defendant, argues that in the first place,’

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMP 1744/2004
Court
High Court CFI
Date31 Oct 2006
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP 1744/2004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 1744 OF 2004

______________________

  IN THE MATTER of All Those 17/301 of 43 equal undivided 800th parts or shares of and in New Kowloon Inland Lot No.4412 (All Those Shop G01 on Ground Floor, Shops 101, 103 and 120 on First Floor, Shop 235 and Second Floor and Shop 445 on Fourth Floor of Rainbow Arcade, San Po Kong Mansion of Nos.84-114 Choi Hung Road and Nos.2-32 Yin Hing Street and Nos.6-14 Tseuk Luk Street, Kowloon, Hong Kong) 
  and
  IN THE MATTER of a Memorandum of Charge registered at the Land Registry by Memorial No.7499296
  and
  IN THE MATTER of a Memorandum of Charge registered at the Land Registry by Memorial No.7602272
  and
  IN THE MATTER of Order 88 of the Rules of High Court, Cap. 4A and Section 19 of Building Management Ordinance, Cap. 344.

______________________

BETWEEN

  THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF SAN PO KONG MANSION Plaintiff
  and  
  ISLAND MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED Defendant

______________________

Before : Deputy High Court Judge Muttrie in Chambers

Date of Hearing : 23 October 2006

Date of Ruling : 31 October 2006

______________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

______________________

1.Paragraph 16, Page 7: ‘Mr. Chong, counsel for the defendant, argues that in the first place,’ should be changed to ‘Mr. Lam, counsel for the defendant, argues that in the first place,’

2.Paragraph 17, Page 7, ‘Mr. Chong also notes that the plaintiff previously attempted to obtain summary judgment………..’ should be changed to ‘Mr. Lam also notes that the plaintiff previously attempted to obtain summary judgment………..’

3.Paragraph 20, Page 8, ‘If the court now determines that the defendant can recover all the outstanding management charges……….’ should be changed to ‘If the court now determines that the plaintiff can recover all the outstanding management charges……….’

4.Paragraph 35, Page 12, ‘Mr. Chong says that this authority is not binding in Hong Kong,’ should be changed to ‘Mr. Lam says that this authority is not binding in Hong Kong,’

Dated the 13th day of November 2006

  K. Chang
Clerk to Muttrie DHCJ

Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

The Incorporated Owners of San Po Kong Mansion v. Island Management Services Ltd.
HCMP 1744/2004
High Court CFI31 Oct 2006
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCMP 1744/2004

The Incorporated Owners of San Po Kong Mansion v. Island Management Services Ltd.
High Court CFI31 Oct 2006