Read the full judgment text of CACV 000316/2005 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 29 November 2006.
1. These appeals arise from a trial before Suffiad J of two actions which were ordered to be heard together. The main issue in both was whether an agreement to perform services existed and if so, on what terms. As found by the Judge, agreements existed on certain terms and damages were accordingly awarded to the Plaintiffs. The Defendants have challenged the Judge’s findings in these appeals. Their case was simply that no agreement existed.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case