Read the full judgment text of CACC 000369/2005 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 8 December 2006.
1. There are two applicants. The first applicant, who was D1 at trial, seeks leave to appeal against sentence; the second applicant who was D2 seeks leave to appeal against conviction. There were ten counts on the indictment but we are concerned with only four. The first two counts alleged that these two applicants conspired to defraud subsidiaries of a public company Shun Cheong Holdings Ltd (SCH); Count 4 that D1 with others so conspired; and Count 10 that D1 with others conspired to deal w