Read the full judgment text of CACC 000561/1976 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. The two appellants each faced three charges in the District Court. These were forgery of a document contrary to s.72(1) of the Crimes Ordinance, uttering that document contrary to s. 74 of the same Ordinance and endeavouring to obtain money by virtue of the document contrary to s. 75. The first appellant was convicted upon all three charges whereas the second appellant was acquitted of the first charge and convicted of the remaining two. The first appellant was sentenced to a total of three y