Asia Televisi on Ltd v. Mak Chi Kin t/a Wilson & Top Marketing Promotion Co and Another
Read the full judgment text of CACV 148/2006 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 16 November 2006.
1. The application is refused as the 1 st defendant has not shown that his case comes within the ambit of section 22(1) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance (Cap. 484). The claim does not come into the $1,000,000 limit. The fact that the plaintiff is a well known company does not mean the case involves matters of great general or public importance or comes within the ‘or otherwise’ limb.
Cited by 1 case
|
CACV 148/2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 148 OF 2006 (ON APPEAL FROM DCCJ 5940 OF 2004) ______________________ BETWEEN
______________________ Before : Hon Cheung JA and Hartmann J in Court Date of Hearing : 16 November 2006 Date of Judgment : 16 November 2006 ______________________ J U D G M E N T ______________________ Hon Cheung JA (giving judgment of the court) : 1.The application is refused as the 1st defendant has not shown that his case comes within the ambit of section 22(1) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance (Cap. 484). The claim does not come into the $1,000,000 limit. The fact that the plaintiff is a well known company does not mean the case involves matters of great general or public importance or comes within the ‘or otherwise’ limb.
Ms Joyce Leung, instructed by Messrs Boase, Cohen & Collins, for the Plaintiff 1st Defendant, in person, present |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACV 148/2006