Read the full judgment text of CACV 148/2006 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 16 November 2006.
1. The application is refused as the 1 st defendant has not shown that his case comes within the ambit of section 22(1) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance (Cap. 484). The claim does not come into the $1,000,000 limit. The fact that the plaintiff is a well known company does not mean the case involves matters of great general or public importance or comes within the ‘or otherwise’ limb.
Cited by 1 case