Gabrielle Marie Hotung v. Sean Eric Mclean Hotung and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCCT 76/2004 on BabelCite. This 高等法院原訟法庭 judgment was delivered on 9 January 2007 before Master de Souza.
Construction and arbitration proceeding under HCCT 76/2004 concerning the matter of Section 26 of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 341) and Order 73 Rule 3 of the Rules of High Court (Cap. 4). The parties are Plaintiff GABRIELLE MARIE HOTUNG and Defendants SEAN ERIC MCLEAN HOTUNG and ANTHONY ERIC RYAN HOTUNG. The judgment was delivered by Master de Souza in chambers on 9 January 2007, following a hearing on 20 December 2006. A corrigendum corrected a sentence clarifying the Plaintiff's reliance on EH for funding and litigation experience related to an application to remove the 1st Defendant as arbitrator. The decision focuses on procedural issues in arbitration-related court proceedings. No substantive determination of legal issues or final disposition is clearly indicated in the provided text.
Cites 1 case
|
HCCT 76/2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTRUCTION AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 76 OF 2004 _________________________
BETWEEN
______________________ Coram : Master de Souza in Chambers Date of Hearing : 20 December 2006 Date of Handing Down Decision : 9 January 2007 _______________ CORRIGENDUM _______________ Kindly note the following correction in the decision of the above-mentioned case handed down by Master de Souza on 9 January 2007:
Dated this 10th day of January 2007.
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCCT 76/2004