Bowardley Enterprises Ltd and Another v. Millennium Group Ltd

Read the full judgment text of CACV 242/2005 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 21 November 2006.

1. We will grant leave to appeal on the great general and public importance ground by reasons of the matters set out in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Notice of Motion.  Costs be in the cause of the appeal.  The usual conditions will apply.

Cited by 3 cases

Case No.CACV 242/2005
Court
Court of Appeal
Date21 Nov 2006
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 242/2005

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 242 OF 2005

(ON APPEAL FROM DCCJ 3039 OF 2004)

______________________

BETWEEN

  BOWARDLEY ENTERPRISES LIMITED 1st Plaintiff
  suing on behalf of itself and all other members of Hong Kong Badminton Association as on 9th August 1997  
  TONG YUN KAI 2nd Plaintiff
  and  
  MILLENNIUM GROUP LIMITED Defendant

Before : Hon Cheung JA, Yuen JA and Chu J in Court

Date of Hearing : 21 November 2006

Date of Judgment : 21 November 2006

______________________

J U D G M E N T

______________________

Hon Cheung JA (giving judgment of the court) :

1.We will grant leave to appeal on the great general and public importance ground by reasons of the matters set out in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Notice of Motion.  Costs be in the cause of the appeal.  The usual conditions will apply.

(Peter Cheung)
Justice of Appeal
(Maria Yuen)
Justice of Appeal
(C. Chu)
Judge of the Court of First Instance

Mr. Francis K. M. Yip, instructed by Messrs Fairbairn Catley Low & Kong, for the Plaintiffs

Mr. Jin Pao, instructed by Messrs Susan Liang & Co., for the Defendant