Tang Sing Yu and Others v. Tang Tat Kwong and Others

Case No.
Court
Date12 Feb 2007
Judge
Case Document
100%

cacv 361/2004

in the high court of the

hong kong special administrative region

court of appeal

civil appeal no. 361 of 2004

(on appeal from HCMP NO. 1466 of 1999)

  IN THE MATTER of Order 113 of the Rules of High Court
  and
  IN THE MATTER of Lot No. 337 in Demarcation District No. 5, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong

BETWEEN

  TANG SING YU, TANG WING CHEUNG and TANG WING CHOY Plaintiffs
  and  
  TANG TAT KWONG, TANG KEE 1st Defendants
  and LAW WAH  
  ALL occupiers of Lot No. 337 in Demarcation District No. 5, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong 2nd Defendants

Before: Hon Rogers VP in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 12 February 2007

Date of Decision: 12 February 2007

______________________

D E C I S I O N

______________________

1.I have read the application in this case and I have read all the papers in this case and I do not see how I can allow this application for stay of execution for a large number of reasons. 

2.Until this application, the Defendant was represented by lawyers and I can only assume that everything was put before the Court which should have been put before the Court.  In those circumstances, I can see no ground for leave to appeal now to the Court of Final Appeal but, apart from that, I do not see that an application has yet been made for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal.  There is a draft application before me but I do not see that a date has yet been fixed.  That is, however, one of the documents which I did consider and I do not now see how those are viable grounds of appeal to the Court of Final Appeal. 

3.So my view remains the same, that I do not see at the moment that there is a viable appeal to the Court of Final Appeal.  Hence, I regret that I cannot see it would be right for me to grant any extension of time. 

(Discussion as to costs)

4.I shall make an order for costs to the Plaintiff.

  (Anthony Rogers)
Vice-President

Mr Chiu Wing-kin, of Messrs Ken Chiu & Co., for the Plaintiffs/Respondents

The first named 1st Defendants/Applicant, in person